Much of the debate about the ethics of cloning for research and therapy turns on a basic disagreement about how we should treat early human embryos as it is . The ethical downside of cloning with recent developments in the cloning of the first whole mammal with dolly the sheep, for the first time the cloning a whole human being seems really possible for years, clones have been the subject. California cloning: a dialogue on state regulation was convened october 12, 2001, by the markkula center for applied ethics at santa clara university its purpose was to bring together experts from the fields of science, religion, ethics, and law to discuss how the state of california should . A new stem cell discovery won't lead directly to human cloning, but it may be time to talk ethics.
Ever since the advent of cloning, there have been arguments for and against this process a fundamental argument is that cloning is ethically wrong and various religious groups have rejected it saying that cloning is equivalent to 'playing god'. The ethics of human cloning - human cloning is separated into two major categories reproductive cloning, which uses cloning technology to create a human embryo that will produce an entire human, and therapeutic, which adopt cloning into field of medical practices to find a cure for many diseases (kass). The ethical implications of human clones have been much alluded to, but have seldom been examined with any rigour this paper examines the possible uses and abuses of human cloning and draws out the principal ethical dimensions, both of what might be done and its meaning the paper examines some of . The ethical issues with reproductive cloning include genetic damage to the clone, health risks to the mother, very low success rate meaning loss of large numbers of embryos and fetuses, psychological harm to the clone, complex altered familial relationships, and commodification of human life.
The ethics of reproductive cloning i turn first to the ethics of reproductive cloning,and then to cloning for biomed- ical researchthe case for banning human reproductive cloning is not difficult to. Cloning is a dominant topic under the broader category of biotechnology ethical issues specific to human cloning include: the safety and efficacy of the procedure, cloning for destructive embryonic stem cell research, the effects of reproductive cloning on the child/parent relationship, and the commodification of human life as a research product. The ethics of human cloning in order to make a fully justified decision on whether human cloning is ethical or not, one must be exposed to the background of the subject to start, a clone is an exact replica of an organism, cell, or gene.
After dolly the sheep was first cloned in scotland in 1997, an impassioned debate on ethics took hold worldwide and has since continued to rage though animal and reproductive cloning are a concern for some religious sects, today the debate is mostly centered on the cloning of human embryonic stem . The main ethical issues associated with therapeutic cloning are those relating to the creation and destruction of embryos, and whether refining the cloning technique will create a ‘slippery slope’ from therapeutic to reproductive cloning 1 reproductive cloning is the use of cloning to grow a living person who shares the dna of the progenitor. To me cloning is humans trying to play god, but as i am a scientific person and have many family members that are in the medical field, i must say that if you could use the technology to clone organs for transplants then that would be ok, cause then you and science could save lives i also think that scientist should come up with a way to . The ethics of cloning-to-produce-children cloning-to-produce-children has been the subject of two major national reports in recent years – first by the national bioethics advisory commission in june 1997, 1 and more recently by the national academy of sciences in january 2002 2 both reports concluded that attempts to clone a human being at this time would be unethical, owing to questions . Concerns about cloning animals for food go beyond questions of food safety in addition to concern for animal welfare, many people have ethical and moral qualms about animal cloning.
In arguing the ethics of reproductive cloning, we find ourselves in the strange position of “speaking on behalf” of human beings who do not yet exist and who may never exist but such a paradox is an inevitable part of our embodied existence. In bioethics, the ethics of cloning refers to a variety of ethical positions regarding the practice and possibilities of cloning, especially human cloningwhile many of these views are religious in origin, some of the questions raised by cloning are faced by secular perspectives as well. Cloning ethics - the biblical principles in regards to cloning ethics, the bible is clear that god is the author of all life one verse in particular is applicable to the cloning issue.
Indeed, it is the bioethicists, not the scientists, who are now the most articulate defenders of human cloning: the two witnesses testifying before the national bioethics advisory commission in favor of cloning human beings were bioethicists, eager to rebut what they regard as the irrational concerns of those of us in opposition. Not surprisingly, the food and drug administration's determination that meat and dairy products from cloned animals are safe to eat has sparked no small controversy critics were quick to level a number of charges against the practice, including claims that animals involved in the process are harmed . “cloning” has been a volatile topic in the news of late in england, for example, the house of lords recently voted 212 to 92 in favor of promoting experiments which will attempt to clone human beings – even though a conglomerate of religious leaders (roman catholics, protestants, jews . The article explores whether reproductive cloning could be ethically justifiable if, at some future time, cloning becomes possible without an elevated risk of anomalies it is argued that freedom to use cloning is a form of procreative freedom and, as such, deserves respect.